首页> 外文OA文献 >Contemporary Social Historical Perspectives on Mental Health Reform
【2h】

Contemporary Social Historical Perspectives on Mental Health Reform

机译:当代社会历史视野下的心理健康改革

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The argument presented in this article is that a new role has been developing in law which can and should be used as a strategy in the provision of services. It will be further argued that there is an important place for the law in setting limits on established psychiatric measures relating, for example, to compulsory admission and treatment, and even to particularly hazardous measures taken with the consent of the patient. The final role of law is to ensure the civil status of those who are the consumers of psychiatric services. One must accept the fact that pernicious legal and social consequences sometimes are secondary features of the receipt of psychiatric services. Here the law can make a distinctive contribution to uphold a person\u27s personal status and dignity. This approach does not pretend to offer a solution to the more collective problems relating to deficiency in services, but the more individualistic approach of the law has its own legitimacy in upholding the integrity of people who have felt dehumanized by institutions, by the opprobrium of society and by the discriminatory character of legislation.
机译:本文提出的论点是,法律上正在发展一种新角色,可以并且应该将其用作提供服务的策略。还将进一步争辩说,法律在限制既定的精神科措施(例如,与强制性入院和治疗有关的措施),甚至是在患者同意下采取的特别危险的措施方面,都具有重要的地位。法律的最终作用是确保精神病服务消费者的公民身份。必须接受这样一个事实,即有害的法律和社会后果有时是接受精神科服务的次要特征。在这里,法律可以做出独特的贡献,以维护一个人的个人地位和尊严。这种方法并不假装为解决与服务不足有关的更为集体的问题提供解决方案,但是法律的更个人主义的方法在维护被机构,社会的耻辱感所困扰的人的廉正上具有其自身的合法性。并具有立法的歧视性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gostin, Lawrence O.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1983
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号